MLUG: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] ideas about housing crisis
[MLUG - DISCUSSION] ideas about housing crisis
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"60 Minutes" ran a segment on the "mortgage mess" the other day:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/25/60minutes/main3752515.shtml

After seeing that, and other things, here's what I'm thinking happened: Many people will always want to buy houses for little or no money down, but they usually can't get a loan. Banks were giving them loans anyway, sometimes for even more than the home was worth. Why? Well, they didn't quite say so on "60 Minutes", but putting two and two together, I think the reason is that they knew the home values were increasing and they would foreclose on people and turn a profit. Why else would they give them low interest for the first year, doubling in the second year to a level that the owner could not pay? Foreclosure had to have been part of the plan. But the banks could do without the risk so they sold it off by letting others package these mortgages into mortgage-backed securities which were sold to unwary investors all over the world. (On the bright side, we did get to screw over some foreign nationals, but how many times can we do that before people will not want to invest here?)

To me it looks like a big scam many layers thick. Many of the people who were in on it probably lost money too when the housing market changed. They knew they were taking a gamble, so I don't feel sorry for the gamblers, but did the gamblers lose? Or did other people who trusted them lose?

The CEO at Merril Lynch who got them into the mortgage securities scandal, and a loss of $8.4 billion, was "fired," which means that he walked away with a $161.5 million compensation package after earning $48 million the year before -- that'll teach him to take big risks with investor money! NY Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/29/business/29merrill.html

The headline says that it was "a swift fall" for the CEO (into multi-hundred millionairedom). Can I fall next? Please?

I guess the moral of that story is "crime really pays," or maybe it's "cheat, cheat, often beat," or "cheaters typically prosper."

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion