Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] primary results
- From: Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 00:38:16 -0600 (CST)
- Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:38:25 -0600
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
Why do reporters suggest that this loss should be devastating for Romney
and for Obama? Romney lost with 32% against McCain's 37%, but he beat
McCain handily in Iowa and in Wyoming. Similarly, Obama lost with 36%
against Clinton's 39%, but Obama beat Clinton solidly in Iowa. Today's
result is obviously good for Clinton and McCain, but I can't see it
hurting Romney or Obama much.
Obama is quite a guy, but if I hear him say "hope" or "change" one more
time, I might scream! ;-) Inspiration is great, but I'm more into
substance than style.
By the way, Huckabee came in 3rd and he said he'd be happy with 4th
because he was ranked 6th a week ago.
All results:
http://www.thenewhampshireprimary.com/results/
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact