Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] I'm in the Missourian
- From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:58:30 -0600
- Delivery-date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:59:07 -0600
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071221 SeaMonkey/1.1.7
McNutt, Justin M. wrote:
Personally I find Mike's messages to be a real mix. What I do these
days is to ignore the "move-on.org" type postings, but he has a lot of
other stuff to say that is definitely worth reading. Sometimes he can
post very encouraging and/or helpful messages. I think a wiser
approach
is not to delete everything he posts, but rather pick and choose what
you read or respond to.
And the other thing I really, really appreciate about Mike is how he
wears his heart on his sleeve, and tells you what he really thinks.
To
quote Proverbs 27:6, "Wounds from a friend can be trusted, but an
enemy
multiplies kisses."
Stephen
By contrast, why I have found is that Mike's arguments tend toward the
following:
"So what you're saying is <gross exaggeration of what you said>"
"That's exactly the kind of thing that a <attack the speaker>"
"You obviously don't know what you're talking about"
"You're wrong, and furthermore, <insert entirely new topic>"
My experience is that everyone uses these kinds of tactics, most likely
largely unconsciously. We tend to notice them in other people only when
we disagree with them.
If you are going to sustain conversations with people with whom you
fundamentally disagree, you really have to swallow this kind of stuff.
The only other option is to only speak with people you mostly agree
with, but you don't grow very much that way.
Finally, all of these argument tactics can be given a different spin.
For example, the first argument could be seen as someone merely trying
to test the logical consequences of taking your position to its extreme.
(I do happen to know one individual - a faculty member at MU - who
doesn't use this kind of polemic. He is one of the most honorable
people I have ever met, but it does come with a bit of a sacrifice - he
tends to see the other person's point of view too easily, even if the
other person is being totally disingenuous.)
Stephen
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion