MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Iowa results
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Iowa results
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Vern Green wrote:

Right, and this is something that will likely come back and haunt Fred. I still like Fred, but I am also one of those odd Christians that do not think that government should be involved in this type of thing.

There are a lot of people who do not agree with me.

I think abortion is probably #1 for Christian conservatives. Some people on this list might not know that I am an atheist whose sister is a Christian conservative -- just thought I'd clarify that.



I don't have a problem with Huckabee except for his stand on illegal immigration which is a little obscure and he has made some changes to it in recent months. He is still a better candidate that McCain or Guiliani and I am glad that he won in Iowa and Guiliani came in as low as he did, I am tired of hearing the media say that Guiliani had it all locked up.

Giuliani didn't even try to do anything with Iowa. But how does that make sense? If he thought he'd lose there in the caucuses, I guess it makes sense to let it go and concentrate on New Hampshire, but what does that say about his chances if he wins the nomination? I think he cannot win the presidency, so I hope he wins the nomination! ;-)


Similarly, I worry about Clinton. Can she win the presidency? I'm not sure. There is a lot not to like about her. I think there are a few big things in her past that may return to haunt her. I also don't like some of her ideas and I'd rather see Obama or Edwards in the White House. An Obama-Edwards ticket or Edwards-Obama ticket would be ideal for me.

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion