Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Iowa results
- From: Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 01:09:10 -0600 (CST)
- Delivery-date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:09:18 -0600
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
As you surely know, Huckabee and Obama are the two winners in Iowa.
What's next? Wyoming on Saturday and New Hampshire on Tuesday. I won't
really care about the Wyoming results (will anyone outside Wyoming?) but
New Hampshire can be important. I would expect both Romney and Giuliani
to do better in New Hampshire, but we'll see.
I liked this article about Huckabee:
http://egan.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/intro/
I would definitely like to see him as the Republican candidate. He seems
much more genuine to me than the others. I kinda like him. The others
mostly make my blood boil. You know he has to be a pretty decent guy if
I'd say I kinda like him and he says that he doesn't believe Darwin's
theory of evolution!
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Jonathan King wrote:
To be honest, I have had increasing confidence that Mike Huckabee will
be the GOP nominee. There are only two Republicans running who have any
stage presence at all, and Huckabee has a lot more of it than Mitt.
So, to be consistent, I should have been able to predict that Obama
would come out way ahead in Iowa as well. But I didn't, because Edwards
has some presence, and Hillary had a lot of advantages as well. I think
it is still Clinton's race to lose, but this was an inauspicious start.
Hillary wasn't making it with her "experience" argument. I will like any
one of those three, but I like her the least. Obama is quite right to
focus on reuniting the country. Clinton will not be able to do that. I
like Edwards' ideas -- he is right up front with them and they are good.
Obama is very focused on inspiring us, which is nice, but we need to hear
more definite plans someday.
Of course, as usual, I will be voting in the primaries way too late to
have any impact on any of this. For that matter, my vote in November has
no impact either since the odds that any Republican will take Maryland
this year are really about as close to zilch as you care to project.
Those of you back in Missouri are going to have a lot more impact most
voters.
Minnesota will surely vote Democrat this time (as last time). It will be
great if we can get rid of Norm Coleman -- that's the more pressing issue
up here. I don't know who'll run against him. Franken is trying but I
don't know if he really has a chance. He just hasn't transitioned well
from comic to serious candidate. He's a smart enough guy, and I think he
can do the job, but I don't know if he can win.
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion