Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Off-Topic Discussion" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] free Rolex with Canadian erection enlargement medication
- From: "Ryan Thornton" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 17:12:55 -0600
- Delivery-date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:13:04 -0600
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=5fDxhZX0+JmbiMCkd4/OPr6yiPzqgMYvBwk4zuhnNxo=; b=cttUWJqgFWyDGjPuZ8vc0qO7sc/eTN/jJE/0VGt5YeMymGi/0crdpqw0AMbE58EVB+5CBrVSbR0DdCU6wRKS7ZGpkcjXEAT4RTil1zzvS06rsuPIQVZpMrfvUAha5jgevTxt00zo2s8PYmwhaQ07DApbJOi7J/Ck03NiuTwlCQo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ivhu8ASdzI/GrVIFG2UnB7H5n+rJTshvUzEQ0ycENfEA7P9DUqttNSmNtTgJaZCl30eWJz/8BINe4XqlsBpgFMS8BsT9egWMg7tUALv3MZR2crYiqMkZ0viwWjGdCDP/06TDAIFSZtvLAIek/S99hEtPaMSJC4UdN05s7fUfhR0=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED, MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
In gmail I have mlug discussions whitelisted so it doesn't matter what
the subject line and content are.
But yeah, I still get a few normal spam that hit gmail.
On Dec 2, 2007 3:04 PM, Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> Yes, I'm kidding. If this message got through your spam filter, you
> probably need a new spam filter.
>
> The crazy thing is, I get so much of that kind of spam that some of it
> does leak through. I recently noticed that one of my university email
> addresses was accounting for the vast majority of my spam -- I have been
> getting about 130 spam messages per day through that account. Once I
> realized that, I started routing all of those messages to a different
> inbox without spam filtering and I discovered that no more than 1-2 out of
> the 130 messages per day were legit. That's pretty amazing.
>
> So I talked to our IT guys about it and they said they were getting 1.4
> million messages per month into our system and delivering 200,000 of those
> messages. That is, about 1.2 million detectable spam messages per month,
> or 40,000 per day, are sent to our department's server. We have maybe 400
> email addresses, so that would be 100 spam messages per day per person.
>
> My worry is that this can continue to get worse. What's to stop the
> spammers from sending us 1,000 messages per person per day? Or more? We
> need to adopt policies that kill these messages with minimal CPU usage,
> preferrably farther out on the perimeter (as they enter umn.edu) so that
> we don't have every division of our University reinventing the wheel.
>
>
> I think I'll resend this with a different subject line so that people will
> see it -- it is a serious issue but I couldn't resist joking about it.
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
> http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion