Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Mike Miller wrote:
I see. My guess is that in a blinded trial, people can't tell the
difference between a $100 CD player and a $1000 CD player (if such a
thing even exists).
I hear a lot about how great certain audio things are, but then
*evidence* is almost always lacking. An example of this is in ideas
about encoding MP3 files. People will make all sorts of unsupported
claims. They do *unblinded* tests, which are a complete waste of time
in my book.
I see where you are coming from. But the blinded trials must be
performed upon people who claim to be able to tell the difference, not
on a random sample from the population. I suspect that if some people
are able to tell the different, then it is only a very few. And it is
these people that the $10,000 A to D converters are aimed at.
I definitely agree with you there. But, I think some people really can't
tell the difference, but they say they can tell, and they might even
believe it. Then they spend the big money and basically brag about how
great their taste is (or hearing, really). They tend to look down their
noses at the rest of us.
I personally do not think I can tell the difference. My personal
favorite listening experience is to listen to MP3 files on my cheapo MP3
player.
I like MP3s through my computer to my stereo. It might rate as an OK
stereo. The weak point there is I need to change to having both (1) a
better sound card and (2) either very quiet fans or the computer needs to
be on the other side of the wall (which is possible where I have my
stereo).
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion