Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Vern Green wrote:
True, but again, I am not asking the government to help me... well
correction, I did get some government grants to go back to school.
So you are "living proof" (to use your term), like Clarence Thomas, that
"government handouts" (wasn't that also your term?) can be a great help to
young people who are trying to make something of themselves.
Are they? And in this they are unlike other people? For example,
Republicans are different?
Well obviously I tend to think they are. When a liberal hears about a
woman that is killed by a mountain lion, and more money gets sent to the
mountin lion cubs trust fund than the one set up for the now motherless
children, I tent to think that is an emotional reaction.
Sorry, I didn't know about that "liberal" cause. Can you elaborate? Are
you saying that Republicans want to send money to the families of people
who are killed by wild animals? And I thought they only wanted to spend
money on warfare and on promoting the interests of the big businesses that
fund their campaigns.
The way I see it, the democrats want to provide handouts to the needy by
taking it from the rich. I like to say that this is a lot like feeding
the wild bears at Yosemite. There are signs all over that say, "Don't
feed the bears" why is that? Because if you feed the bears, they become
dependent on it and become dangerous when the handouts stop.
Now that you've had your government handouts, are you dangerous? In what
sense has the government made you dangerous?
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion