Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Off-Topic Discussion" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: licenses, tigers, and bears... was [Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Google Docs now has presentations, and a cool low-tech video...]
- From: "Jonathan King" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:16:40 -0400
- Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:16:55 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=wKSnyRScxmimDOUuCEWtxKZdy1A+DA2kFo+W+gyaFoc=; b=pL0t0Zpl6jpE9eWpPAvFsPVbOAzwLCkMKTkMRLWjpwcUxVQIos//T14hsK0wpBi5kTHGWx5keE/ewQoUTpwGvTaF21hprKMfAsnc5yXhyZfwYwnwyjjpUssVO/iLw2NzM+NVjp4q1CmiLIoApGPMGhATcKdZf8N+TnOhFgQMYd0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rOAN2+uST8fj11X8+3mMcFhwPFT5T8oh0eJPWtLVOysGwS++kUOOAFuCLPEJF6OKcrdiuZ+eb/o5JrG0rkvwPH4klbOSvmVTgoX7EBCxUBA/GbK4+E5GYGsfd7btffMwnvdM/LXpXh7KAdqndArqWTk+K08tAXv/SLDj02WVhVk=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
I'm actually fine with this, as well. I just pointed it out because
although this seems like a pretty cool product, it will end up costing
you, and this (reasonably) has some effect on my enthusiasm. Or, to
put it another way, Google Docs now has a pretty neato data import
feature, and this costs me nothing, so I'm more likely to play with
it. It's clear that kirix is going to be able to do a lot more, but
it's not yet completely clear to me how much of this I'll be doing, so
there you go.
jking
On 9/25/07, Rick <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> Well, while I have the linux bigot's love of open source projects, I'm
> pragmatic enough to understand that companies don't do things for some
> crazy altruistic reason. They do things to make money. In some
> instances, open source helps companies do that (regardless of MS'
> "facts" to the contrary). But if a company wants to write software and
> put it under something other than the GPL, more power to them. My only
> issue is when said company is attempting to unethically benefit from the
> hard work of others.
>
> I'm pretty ok with a company making money off of me as long as they
> provide me with something that I desire for a reasonable fee.
>
> Rick
>
> On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 19:10 -0500, Mike Miller wrote:
> > Jon pointed out that it is not free software (open source), but these guys
> > do seem to be trying and they have made some contributions:
> >
> > http://www.kirix.com/faq.html#c325
> > (see last item)
> >
> > Mike
> >
>
> --
> so lemme see, if I download MP3s the RIAA hates me, if I dub a movie off
> HBO the MPAA hates me, if I skip commercials the TV execs hate me...
> am I allowed to store leftover pizza in the fridge and eat it the next
> day, or will Pizza Hut sue me?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
> http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion