Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Sun, 9 Sep 2007, Mike Miller wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwC544Z37qo
I agree with what you say about the violin. Playing Paganini's hardest
pieces perfectly, or Rachmaninov on piano, is really much more
impressive than this for several reasons. Playing Tetris with the
version of the game he was using is very much like sight reading music
fairly quickly.
Here's my analysis of how he does it: The tetraminos can be dropped into
any of 10 columns, but depending on the piece and orientation it could be
a few fewer than that. Some pieces have 4 possible orientations, some 2
and some only one.
Equal width font needed:
<pre>
X X X Or X X X four orientations each with either 8 or 9 columns
X X per orientation. Total: 2 * (2*8 + 2*9) = 68
X X Or X X two orientations each with either 8 or 9 columns
X X X X per orientation. Total: 2 * (8 + 9) = 34
X four orientations with either 8 or 9 columns per
X X X orientation. Total: 2*8 + 2*9 = 34
X X X X two orientations, either 7 or 10 columns.
Total: 7 + 10 = 17
X X one orientation with 9 columns. Total = 9
X X
</pre>
Thus, I see a total of 162 possible "normal" moves. In addition to this
there are tricks where the piece can be slid sideways after coming down or
it can be twisted into a position that is physically impossible but is
allowed by the software.
This is a little easier than it sounds because the normal moves consist of
19 orientations for pieces followed by dropping into some column: So the
job has two parts to it. Reading music is different in that the note is
given to the reader, but in tetris the player must decide which move to
use based on the pattern of fallen tetraminos. So I would say that it's a
bit more like jazz improvising.
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion