Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Vern Green wrote:
So then in your statement:
I would much rather see everyone serve in the military with all of them
being forced to go to war, if their is a war, regardless of parental
income or political office. If that were the law, there would be no
wars for a long, long time. When the people declaring war and the
people dying in the war are not relatives, you are going to see more
war.
I have to assume that you are claiming that this should also to extend
to all the other countries in the world and not just the United States.
You have to? What are you talking about? I don't even know what it means
for this to "extend to all other countries."
Since aside from Iraq, and that can be argued, the US has not started a
war in 100 years.
The US was attacked by Vietnam? We were attacked by Kosovo? Somalia?
Grenada? Panama? Iraq in 1990? What does it mean to "start" a war?
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact