Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Mike Miller wrote:
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Jack Smith wrote:
Most music encoded in 192 kbps MP3 and decent speakers sounds close enough
to the original CD that I can't tell the difference. 128 kbps is all
right, but it can sound a little "fuzzy" at times. Anything below 128 kbps
is crap. I use Ogg Vorbis much more than MP3 and Ogg is a little better,
with a 160 kbps Ogg Vorbis file being pretty much indistinguishable from
thee original CD to me.
Have any of you seen results of a blinded, randomized test? That's really
what is needed. Some special precautions also have to be taken (e.g., volume
control). It's tricky. I feel the same as you, Jack, but it's hard for me
to know what people really can here.
That was supposed to be "what people really can *hear*."
Anyway, I do know how to spell but I often replace the intended word with
a homonym, though I usually catch myself. Jon King would probably know
why that happens.
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion