Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] 9/11: Press for Truth

["Vern Green" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

So based on your response there is nothing in the movie about Clinton, it is all Bush's fault. Typical.

 

It is humorous how the liberals are so lathered up in this country in their hatred for Bush. It is bordering on the mentally ill.

 

On 8/28/07, Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Vern Green wrote:

> One question.
>
> How much time was devoted to Clinton and his failures? This will tell a
> lot as to how fair this movie is in my opinion.
>
> In my humble opinion, no timeline can be developed that concentrates
> only on Bush, and if that is the case here, then it is a biased piece of
> hog wash.


I don't recall at this point (I sent that to the list in July), but didn't
Clinton's team warn Bush's team about Osama during the transition, and
didn't Bush do nothing?  Didn't Bush ignore all of the warnings including
the Presidential daily briefing of 6 Aug 2001 entitled "bin Laden
determined to strike in US?":

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/10/august6.memo/

And didn't Clinton, even if he made mistakes as you obviously will claim,
prevent bin Laden from succeeding?  Or at least, bin Laden did not succeed
in attacking us while Clinton was President.

Another very important difference here is that Bush has used his failure
-- the major attacks of 9/11/2001 -- to promote himself and increase his
power.  Supposedly, he is "strong on terror(ism)."  The obvious fact is
that he was weak on terrorism and he failed completely to protect us.  He
did not do what he should have done, what he was told to do, and because
of his personal failure and that of Condoleeza Rice, we were attacked
successfully.

When the WTC was attacked a month after Clinton took office, the attackers
were hunted down, captured and imprisoned.  By contrast, GWB says of Osama
bin Laden, "I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really
don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."

If Clinton had "failures" they were very small and insignificant when
compared with Bush's failures.  Make two lists and compare them.

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion

-- 
Thanks
F Vernon Green 
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion