Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
There is sufficient disinformation (and also sufficient exaggeration
from the pro-global side) that if one doesn't have a science background,
and if one doesn't spend some time looking at the evidence, then one
could be deceived.
Definitely, and that is really the whole point of spreading
disinformation: To deceive people!
The little I know of John Stossel also tells me that he is a critical
thinker, and I suspect that if he is wrong on this particular issue, it
is with genuine and not dishonest motives.
I hope so. I would like him on my team! He has a lot of excellent stuff
on his "Give Me A Break!" segments on 20/20.
I should add that I know of at least one case where the accusation of
"paid whore of oil companies" made of a scientist is totally scurrilous,
and I think it hurts the pro-global warming cause to make these
accusations without having strong evidence to back it up.
Can you tell us?
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact