MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Fox News and global warming
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Fox News and global warming
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Mike Miller wrote:
It is interesting that one network is playing such a strong role in promoting distortions of science:

http://foxattacks.com/

I have been especially disappointed by John Stossel recently because he used to seem so good to me: A genuine skeptic and critical thinker, or so it seemed. But when it comes to global warming, gasoline prices and a few other issues, he seems to have a blind spot. I have to wonder if he's getting paid.

Most of the people shown in the Fox News clips are being paid by oil companies either directly or indirectly (via "think tanks").

While I think that global warming is an issue that we should be taking seriously, and while this is one of those issues where I would agree with you that Fox News (or at least their commentators) are disgracing themselves, I don't think it is fair to label everyone who thinks global warming is "junk science" as a paid whore of the oil companies. There is sufficient disinformation (and also sufficient exaggeration from the pro-global side) that if one doesn't have a science background, and if one doesn't spend some time looking at the evidence, then one could be deceived. The little I know of John Stossel also tells me that he is a critical thinker, and I suspect that if he is wrong on this particular issue, it is with genuine and not dishonest motives.


I should add that I know of at least one case where the accusation of "paid whore of oil companies" made of a scientist is totally scurrilous, and I think it hurts the pro-global warming cause to make these accusations without having strong evidence to back it up.

Stephen


_______________________________________________ discussion mailing list EMAIL:PROTECTED http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion