Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] no new laboratory space for Mizzou? [politics, I guess]

[Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Jonathan King wrote:

> I am afraid I don't keep up very closely with what's been going on back 
> in Missouri, but in a spare moment earlier today I took a look at this:
>
> http://www.columbiamissourian.com/stories/2007/07/08/blunts-building-boom-meeting-rooms-replace-medical/
>
> Does anybody on the list have any insight into how this really happened? 
> This strikes me as a really, really unfortunate result, and the kind of 
> thing that will be really wince-worthy inside of a decade. But maybe I 
> am missing something?


Some people don't want to promote science, Jon.  If you think about it, 
scientists have for millennia questioned the teachings of Christianity and 
the Bible.  Science is a religion just like Christianity is a religion, 
but the teachings of Science are very offensive and false:  Belief that 
men evolved from lower organisms and were not created by a supreme being, 
belief that the universe was created by an inexplicable "Big Bang" and not 
by the loving hand of Our Creator, and the belief that it is acceptable 
for men to play God in the laboratory by toying with DNA, cells and other 
fundamental and perfect creations that should never be altered by man. 
In addition, scientists are promoters of an evil scourge called Secular 
Humanism.

Some people might think that it is OK for tax dollars to help scientists 
to promote their sick religion in our college classrooms, but they must be 
stopped.  The money could be used instead to promote Missourian Christian 
values through instruction in business management, accounting, finance or 
Bible studies.

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion