MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Vern Green wrote:

You can say what you want to about Bush and his policies, but there is one thing that is clear. Bush's policies on the war on terror have kept this country safe. The actions recently in England drive home the fact that there are still those out there that want to kill those of us in the west. The fact that the biggest prize of all, the United States, has not been attacked again since September 11th speaks volumes about the administrations attempts to keep America safe.


It has now been almost 6 years since 9/11/2001. How many terrorist attacks did our country suffer in the 6 years *before* 9/11/2001? How many afterward? To me it doesn't seem like a big difference.

It is pretty easy to argue it either way. One might say that U.S. policy has served to inspire terrorist groups all over the world and to help in their recruitment campaigns. The recent attack in Britain and earlier attacks in Britain and Spain might all have been prevented if we'd taken different strategies in dealing with international terrorism. How do you know?

So where is the *evidence* that Bush's approach has been working?

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion