MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, Jonathan King wrote:

In any case, the real problem with the vast majority of conspiracy theory stories is the implausibility of keeping (for decades) the kinds of massive secrets that are usually required for the theories to "work".


That's why I reject most conspiracy theories as implausible. I agreed with Jerry Gamblin about the guys who made "Loose Change" and how they responded to the Popular Mechanics guys. I don't know if this book is in the same mold. But I'll say this: Even if it is 100% baloney, it is worth noting that nearly every customer reviewer on Amazon is giving it 5 stars, so people must be reading it.

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion