Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] iPhone - my brief review

["Vern Green" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

Well, personally, I would rather have a phone that was sensitive to my touch than one that does a pocket call almost anytime i stuff it in my pocket.

 

My Audiovox 6600 does exactly that. It will respond to the touch of anything, pocket sides, stylus, felt tip pens, cat paws, rocks, and keys.

 

On 7/2/07, Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:

On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Jonathan King wrote:

> On 7/2/07, Mike Miller < EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
>
>> Another feature of the iPhone that was tricky to deal with:  It doesn't
>> respond unless you are touching it with the fleshy part of your finger.
>> I'm not sure how that works but it doesn't respond to a fingernail or
>> stylus.  Women with long fingernails won't be able to use it easily.
>
> The same issue with gloves. This is because the technology they use
> depends on the fact that there is a surprisingly large potential
> difference between your skin and most of the surrounding environment, so
> you can get a measurable signal when you touch a correctly designed
> device. But fingernails and gloves and such tend to be effective
> insulators, which is why this won't work. I'm guessing you could (and
> somebody will) develop an "electric" stylus that could be used with this
> kind of screen.


That makes sense.  Wouldn't a metal stylus work?  If it conducts
electricity well, wouldn't it have the same potential as the fingers it is
touching?

The stylus would be good for precision, but it wouldn't allow for Apple's
outstanding new multitouch feature.

I guess Apple's new touch design implies that multitouch doesn't work with
old-fashioned touch screens like the one on my Treo.

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion

-- 
Thanks
F Vernon Green 
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion