Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Jerry Gamblin wrote:
Came across this great link on improving your power point skills:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLpjrHzgSRM
very funny ;-)
Nice. I just got back from a conference so I can say that even the
professional presenters with years of experience do some of these things
poorly. One thing I was getting a lot of, and hating, was the 3-d bar
charts: They have depth, but the depth doesn't convey information and it
only makes the numbers much harder to discern. Here's one:
http://www.sapdesignguild.org/community/book_people/images/3D-Sdgm.gif
So sometimes you can see where the bar lines up with the back wall and you
can figure out from that how tall it is, but other times the bar doesn't
go that far back, so you really can't figure out easily how tall it is!
I mean, it's nuts. The thing is, a simple bar graph does a much better
job:
http://www.chestysoft.com/xgraph/images/bar.gif
Color: unnecessary. Legend: unnecessary. I like error bars and I like
numerical labels. Why not? -- That is information we can use!
Check this out:
http://www.geoafrica.co.za/reddog/gsw/grapherwhatsnew.htm
Are those 3-d graphs a joke? I was hoping they were a joke, but I'm not
sure. It amazes me that people might believe that such absurd graphs are
good in some way.
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion