Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
This article unfortunately confuses two groups of people.
1. Those (like me) who believe that Jesus is the Messiah, and fulfills the
hopes and aspirations of the Old Testament writings. Of course, this is
precisely the meaning of Handel's Messiah
(http://opera.stanford.edu/iu/libretti/messiah.htm), not a cheering on of the
destruction of the Second Temple in 70AD.
2. Those who are anti-semitic, and who have an irrational hatred of all
Jewish people. Since my mother's side of the family are all descended from
Jewish refugees who escaped from Germany in the 1930's. and since I would be
a prime candidate for Hitler's concentration camps, clearly I am not in this
category.
I didn't feel confused by the article. It was a lesson in the perspective
of the people of that day. Christianity has a history of anti-Semitism
but things are somewhat better today, at least here in the U.S. In fact,
I have the impression that many evangelical Christians in the U.S. are
cheering for Israel and want to fight Israel's enemies.
This is the author of the article (3.5 years ago):
http://www.swarthmore.edu/bulletin/sept03/dayinthelife.html
He has also studied anti-Semitism in Bach's works:
http://www.icjs.org/scholars/bachmaris.html
In making this confusion, this article should be regarded as a hateful
and trashy anti-Christian diatribe.
Can you tell me where the article it "makes confusion?" It's an
historical article that really is not about the Christianity of today.
It's about what was going on in the 18th century. I can't find anything
wrong with the article and you didn't point out anything wrong with it
either.
I suppose you didn't like what was written about John Newton...
If Jews make up "them," who is the "thou"? Jesus, as John Newton
explains in his 1786 book "Messiah: Fifty Sermons on the Celebrated
Oratorio of Handel": The resurrected Jesus, sitting at the right hand
of God, unleashed his anger on the Jews by having the Roman armies lay
waste to Jerusalem and its temple in A.D. 70.
Newton is best known today as the author of the hymn "Amazing Grace,"
and he is a central figure in the film of that name now in theaters, in
which he is portrayed as repenting his devotion to the slave trade in
the 1780s. But his grace apparently wasn't amazing enough to curb the
constant affirmation of anti-Jewish sentiment in his "Messiah" sermons.
Here he comments, "The music to which Psalm 2:9 is set is so well
adapted to the idea that it expresses, as, in a manner, to startle
those who hear it." In Jennens and Handel's time, Christians were all
but unanimous in believing that the violence depicted in Psalm 2:9
represented the prophesying type for a later event: the destruction of
Jerusalem and its temple, the fulfilling antitype. So when Jennens has
brought in Psalm 2 and its understood prophecy of the destruction of
the temple, widely understood as signaling God's rejection of Judaism,
what is the response? "Hallelujah! for the Lord God omnipotent
reigneth; the kingdom of this world is become the kingdom of our Lord
and of his Christ" (Revelation 19:6, 19:16 and 11:5).
...but what's wrong with it? Is it surprising? Newton wasn't all that
great of a guy, as you know. Anti-Semitism was wide-spread among European
Christians for centuries.
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion