MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [RELIGION] Unsettling History of That Joyous 'Hallelujah'
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [RELIGION] Unsettling History of That Joyous 'Hallelujah'
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:

This article unfortunately confuses two groups of people.

1. Those (like me) who believe that Jesus is the Messiah, and fulfills the hopes and aspirations of the Old Testament writings. Of course, this is precisely the meaning of Handel's Messiah (http://opera.stanford.edu/iu/libretti/messiah.htm), not a cheering on of the destruction of the Second Temple in 70AD.
2. Those who are anti-semitic, and who have an irrational hatred of all Jewish people. Since my mother's side of the family are all descended from Jewish refugees who escaped from Germany in the 1930's. and since I would be a prime candidate for Hitler's concentration camps, clearly I am not in this category.

I didn't feel confused by the article. It was a lesson in the perspective of the people of that day. Christianity has a history of anti-Semitism but things are somewhat better today, at least here in the U.S. In fact, I have the impression that many evangelical Christians in the U.S. are cheering for Israel and want to fight Israel's enemies.


This is the author of the article (3.5 years ago):

http://www.swarthmore.edu/bulletin/sept03/dayinthelife.html

He has also studied anti-Semitism in Bach's works:

http://www.icjs.org/scholars/bachmaris.html


In making this confusion, this article should be regarded as a hateful and trashy anti-Christian diatribe.

Can you tell me where the article it "makes confusion?" It's an historical article that really is not about the Christianity of today. It's about what was going on in the 18th century. I can't find anything wrong with the article and you didn't point out anything wrong with it either.


I suppose you didn't like what was written about John Newton...

If Jews make up "them," who is the "thou"? Jesus, as John Newton explains in his 1786 book "Messiah: Fifty Sermons on the Celebrated Oratorio of Handel": The resurrected Jesus, sitting at the right hand of God, unleashed his anger on the Jews by having the Roman armies lay waste to Jerusalem and its temple in A.D. 70.

Newton is best known today as the author of the hymn "Amazing Grace," and he is a central figure in the film of that name now in theaters, in which he is portrayed as repenting his devotion to the slave trade in the 1780s. But his grace apparently wasn't amazing enough to curb the constant affirmation of anti-Jewish sentiment in his "Messiah" sermons.

Here he comments, "The music to which Psalm 2:9 is set is so well adapted to the idea that it expresses, as, in a manner, to startle those who hear it." In Jennens and Handel's time, Christians were all but unanimous in believing that the violence depicted in Psalm 2:9 represented the prophesying type for a later event: the destruction of Jerusalem and its temple, the fulfilling antitype. So when Jennens has brought in Psalm 2 and its understood prophecy of the destruction of the temple, widely understood as signaling God's rejection of Judaism, what is the response? "Hallelujah! for the Lord God omnipotent reigneth; the kingdom of this world is become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ" (Revelation 19:6, 19:16 and 11:5).

...but what's wrong with it? Is it surprising? Newton wasn't all that great of a guy, as you know. Anti-Semitism was wide-spread among European Christians for centuries.


Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion