RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Loose Change 9/11 documentary

["Hargus, Diana" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

Maybe the title should be "Loose Nuts"?  But yes, the theories are  a
little strange, but the little retractions people made could make some
people think (not me, I have this little tricorn tinfoil hat for
emergencies).  As to the "fact" that there are 9 hijackers still alive:
One of the blurbs had some text mentioning that he had his passport
stolen 3 years earlier in Cairo.  Sounds almost plausible to me, what
with identity theft becoming so common.  I watched the videos but did
not view the website; saving that for tonight.  As to the documentation,
it would be more believable if they had some valid citations for them.

Diana

> -----Original Message-----
> From: EMAIL:PROTECTED [mailto:discussion-
> EMAIL:PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Miller
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 9:42 AM
> To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion
> Subject: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Loose Change 9/11
> documentary
> 
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Hargus, Diana wrote:
> 
> > Are you sure Jerry is not in on it too?  On no!  What if I am in on
> it?
> 
> I've been working with Cheney on this for years.  I think I developed
a
> pretty good cover.
> 
> Here's one thing that I thought was really weird in "Small Change":
> They
> say that there were $162 billion in gold bars under the WTC.  Really?
> Or
> maybe they said "there have been rumors that there were $162 billion
in
> gold bars under the WTC."  Something like that.  Then later they say
> that
> $200 million in gold were recovered and, ominously, "what happened to
> the
> rest of the gold?"
> 
> You get the impression that these guys are really stretching.  Their
> claims about the crashes at the Pentagon and in the field in
> Pennsylvania
> are pretty ludicrous.  How could it be that there were no jets at
those
> sites?  The Popular Mechanics guy was much more believable on that
> issue.
> 
> I would like to know if it is true that the neocons had a document
that
> said a Pearl-Harbor-like tragedy might be necessary for them to move
> their
> agenda forward.  That is what they claimed in "Small Change."  There
> were
> a few other interesting claims about the behavior of officials before
> 9/11
> that I would like to know more about.
> 
> They also claim that at least 9 of the 9/11 hijackers are still alive
> and
> working in various parts of the world.  Can they prove that?  I find
it
> very hard to believe.
> 
> One thing's for sure:  The Democrats are investigating everything and
> if
> there is credible evidence for any of this stuff, they will use it.
> I'll
> await the results of their inquests.
> 
> Mike
> 
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
> http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion 
 
***********************
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: 
This e-mail and any attachments are intended only for those to which it is addressed and may contain information which is privileged, confidential and prohibited from disclosure and unauthorized use under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, or copying of this e-mail or the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited by the sender. If you have received this transmission in error, please return the material received to the sender and delete all copies from your system.

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion