Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Off-Topic Discussion" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] "missing" files after hard crash or power failure
- From: "Mark Rages" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 14:09:02 -0500
- Delivery-date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 14:09:09 -0500
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LfF2tZIOmJIsYb6Ccs/27kvQ0cuHrFWZMFybdTzncb9IAzHCgbOZKJLbXJCSOu7717gad9US3FULjMBW97WpXmdcjD3Id6dIn7hQpigKZ+Yf87KJWvtAo7CkpM54U5oYDI1ag738nYsZacFpsghgfZvLfy/NKTiJksVgRcQ/C8U=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uucZ9ho1qz7aCvEHuCMjlbmzIM74+rcr1rm+3xS3lyjb9D9Zp+OzlNjVIu2oRTDUWrv+jSh2reC9+P2JYMq22vibXrZzJj3JvxuyUbDH88553JMLVlGIJJvuN2q+W7bHnXeZXZ1PLxrRDEVVsIbT9PowthSv7ijeoJIAhh5ZWXY=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
On 4/2/07, George Robb <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
There is a package for playing with the cache / drive parameters in
general... hdparm
http://freshmeat.net/projects/hdparm/
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2000/06/29/hdparm.html
A simple hdparm /dev/<your drive here (not partition)> will tell the
current parameters.
Good point that if there is a large cache on the drives or if they
are on a RAID controller there could be some serious data floating in
cache.
;)
Does sync() cause the data to be written? I'm guessing no, since the
man page says:
According to the standard specification (e.g., SVID), sync() schedules
the writes, but may return before the actual writing is done. However,
since version 1.3.20 Linux does actually wait. (This still does not
guarantee data integrity: modern disks have large caches.)
Regards,
Mark
EMAIL:PROTECTED
--
Most of the time,
for most of the world,
no matter how hard people work at it,
nothing of any significance happens.
-- Weinberg's Law
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion