MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] is it possible to define "a lie"?
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] is it possible to define "a lie"?
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Mike Miller wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Mike Miller wrote:

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:

My sense is that Al Franken put way too much attention on the ANS-like aspects of Bill's life, and not enough on the substantive issues.


That's a good question -- does O'Reilly get facts wrong about things other than himself? I have seen him say things that were demonstrably, incorrect then repeat them angrily when questioned. Stuff like that.


Do you have any examples in mind? I'm not trying to probe you - if you say you don't remember them off hand, I'll accept that. But I want to get a sense of the nature of these incorrect statements. I have to admit that I have never heard him say anything that was clearly wrong or misleading. I don't always agree with his conclusions, but I have always felt that his process of arriving at the conclusions was up front and honest. But I could be wrong.


This is the one I had in mind:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200501250001
http://mediamatters.org/items/200502010001

The first one introduces the topic and shows what Barbara Boxer really said and what he said she said. In the second one callers try to correct his mistake. He yells at the caller, takes a really superior dominant tone and, well, you can see what he says in the last paragraph. The crazy thing is that the caller was definitely right and O'Reilly was definitely wrong. I'm not saying he was lying because he might have been confused, but look at how off base he can be and still have that smug, superior tone.

I think that much of this is over-zealous hyperbole rather than out and out lying. But I do agree that with the second example, he did show himself to be a bit of a jerk. And it does tend to corroborate the Peabody/Polk award event. It looks like he doesn't take to admitting his own mistakes easily. (A common fault amongst many people, it should be said.)


Stephen

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion