Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Mike Miller wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Mike Miller wrote:
So you look into it and you find the he is "not being quite the totally up
front guy he claims to be" which is euphemistic for "O'Reilly's persona is
all a charade," or even "O'Reilly seems to be a liar."
Yes, but a great many people engage in this kind of deception about who
they really are, and many of them do so unconsciously, even to the point of
self-deception. It is by no means clear to me that O'Reilly does this on
purpose. It is rather like bias in the media - it is quite likely that at
least some of it is there by mistake.
I am sure that some people do it in a cold calculating fashion, and others
don't. But which O'Reilly does is hard to say.
But it is also, to some extent, immaterial. Really the proper way to
assess O'Reilly is to listen to the message, and analyse that, not to try
to analyse the messenger.
Well, our topic was O'Reilly. If you watch O'Reilly you will see that one of
his favorite topics also is O'Reilly. If you want to listen to the message,
be my guest. I'm not very interested in his message -- why should I be? But
if he has an important idea, and someone tells me about it, I'm happy to
listen.
OK, but my point was not to suggest that you listen to O'Reilly, but to so
that the proper way to judge him is on the basis of his message. When I
first saw the book title "Liars and the lies they tell," I assumed that it
would be chock-a-block full of how O'Reilly and such like lie with their
message, not a list of their minor character defects. If O'Reilly had a
habit of making blatantly false assertions about the world around him,
that to me would be a lot more newsworthy. As it is, the defects pointed
out are kind of similar to the question you asked about Clinton's lies -
how do these affect his professional abilities? My sense is that Al
Franken put way too much attention on the ANS-like aspects of Bill's life,
and not enough on the substantive issues.
Stephen
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion