Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] is it possible to define "a lie"?

[Stephen Montgomery-Smith <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

Mike Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>
> > Mike Miller wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> > >
> > > > On the other hand, the counter-argument that O'Reilly also should 
> > > > have been more careful is also valid - even though he didn't have a 
> > > > legal responsibility, I do agree with you that he screwed the pooch 
> > > > on this one.
> > >
> > >
> > > Exactly!
> > >
> > > Mike
> >
> >
> > See, we are finding some consensus.
>
>
> You should try to see the big picture too.  Why does O'Reilly often 
> claim that he is not a registered Republican?  I mean, why mention it?  
> Why does he often say that he opposes the death penalty?  Why is that 
> important?

All I said is that he screwed the pooch.

But look, if you are simply trying to say that O'Reilly is trying to 
project a certain image to certain people, that doesn't necessarily 
reflect entirely accurately who he really is, I have already admitted to 
that possibility.  I called it "him not being quite the totally up front 
guy he claims to be."

--

Stephen Montgomery-Smith
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion