Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] is it possible to define "a lie"?

[Stephen Montgomery-Smith <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

Mike Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>
> > Mike Miller wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> > >
> > > > Mike Miller wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > But also, now that I have seen the evidence of sexual harassment, 
> > > > > > I can now see why you didn't present this as your prime evidence.  
> > > > > > It really is of the same quality as the other pieces of evidence. 
> > > > > > Although if it could be independently verified, I agree that it 
> > > > > > would be totally huge.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Now that she has been paid off, it's over.
> >
> >
> > One of the things that makes me suspicious about this whole story is 
> > just how aggressive O'Reilly is alleged to have behaved.  Now while it 
> > is true that some alpha type males do this kind of thing, and some in 
> > positions of power are even stupid enough to do this kind of thing, 
> > nevertheless people who do this kind of thing do it over and over 
> > again. It is like serial killers, it is an urge that just cannot be 
> > mastered. And the alleged behavior is just so very over the top, that 
> > it is hard (although I do admit not impossible) to believe that he 
> > didn't do this to other people, and who also would have come forward 
> > and corroborated the story.
>
>
> Well, we'll see.  I do think O'Reilly is aggressive.

I was talking about being sexually aggressive.  I thought that was 
obvious from the context.

I already know he is an alpha type male.  That needs no proof.


--

Stephen Montgomery-Smith
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion