Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Off-Topic Discussion" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] is it possible to define "a lie"?
- From: "Spurling, Shannon" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:22:54 -0600
- Delivery-date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 08:23:03 -0600
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED du><EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED .edu><EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED><EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- Thread-index: AcdcDHQyHFqg2aeuSpmmo+LnFqQngQAAArPQ
- Thread-topic: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] is it possible to define "a lie"?
...
>
> So you think O'Reilly will pay out more than $2 million to anyone who
> makes up a story about him? That seems pretty unlikely to me.
>
...
He was going to fight it to the end. His legal counsel persuaded him to
settle, and he didn't like it. The settlement was also for a lot less
than originally requested. IIRC.
If he were really like that, I am surprised that more people didn't come
forward. It was a really strange situation from the start.
S-
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact