Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] is it possible to define "a lie"?

[Stephen Montgomery-Smith <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

Mike Miller wrote:

> The thing that I find strange and frustrating is that you and Stephen 
> can't just accept what happened, as it obviously did happen.  Why 
> pretend? Why twist everything around and make excuses for this guy?  
> It's not as if he is your friend but you act like he is.

I think you are being really unfair here.  My problem isn't that I want 
O'Reilly to be found innocent at any costs.  But I do want to give him, 
or anyone else for that matter, the benefit of the doubt.  I think I am 
showing very reasonable skepticism with the evidence.  I'm not saying 
that the accusations are necessarily false, but I am saying that the 
evidence is weak.

But also, when you make accusations against us like you did here, you 
really are playing a very unfair game.  And it ceases to be an 
intelligent and searching conversation, and becomes a war of who can 
present the best wrought insults.


_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion