Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Off-Topic Discussion" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Got a TV bigger than 55 inches?
- From: "Jonathan King" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 00:10:51 -0500
- Delivery-date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 23:11:06 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MsgTj9ySe6HECaDWlobHSlAI/6C6CA3pRM0A9fzFxxV5uFeifhmblkHEdWZzFbEv6BnsoXT5XVWvP12/B/jsuKoGF2vP9dn4qOzk+uiDsLHhR2oQUZDrEHA/5i+0kesvhPuQ9upNTc5jcgk33XPoquRWuCeT25rqYu12FTsjzAk=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
On 2/1/07, Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Christian M. Cepel wrote:
> At our church we used to do a delay. We'd pipe the feed to a small
> monitor and a recorder, and manage to cut the alcohol, tobacco and 'sex
> sells' commercials out. The NFL should offer this option for families.
> Remember the discussions of all the kids that expressed a variety of
> emotions at the 'wardrobe malfunction' incident...
They charge millions of dollars for a 30 second spot. I don't think they
want people cutting the ads out.
Certainly not *all* the ads. That is, after all, the income stream.
If they offer different ads depending on
what you want to see, then they would have two sets of advertisers paying
different amounts of money and they wouldn't know in advance which set of
ads people are most likely to watch.
Pshaw. The point here is that we have a fairly well-defined
demographic that does not care for certain ad types (e.g., Budweiser,
casinos, maybe some movies or TV shows) but would probably be okay
with (e.g.) more car/soda/computers/whatever ads. I think an
arrangement could be made to offer a more "clean" broadcast over a
satellite or cable link, possibly for a price. I don't expect the
problem with churches is that they wouldn't pay *something* to do a
broadcast they could approve of, just that right now they can't get
the broadcast they want and/or for a pricing scheme that seems
reasonable. If the NFL were really smart, they would say, "Fine; you
can charge whatever you like but we need $2 per head and we'll give
$0.25 of that to NFL charities." I don't think this is rocket science
these days, and I'm sure the good will would be worth it.
I think it would hurt their business. So I don't see it changing any time soon.
I agree that *they* think it would hurt their business, but, to be
honest, they might not know until they try to find out. Once upon a
time, when there was Monday Night baseball, my friends and I in a
choral music group would get together to have dinner, watch the game,
and (usually before) have an hour-long practice session. It was very
popular; had it come down to it, I'm sure we would have tossed in a
buck a person for a feed (if that was possible back then) because it
would have been cheaper than a bar plus we could sing whenever we
wanted.
As usual, the lack of creativity in what is essentially an
entertainment industry amazes me.
jking
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion