Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Off-Topic Discussion" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Got a TV bigger than 55 inches?
- From: "Mark Rages" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 22:15:21 -0600
- Delivery-date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 22:15:41 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BSUDylQ/pC5RfgS5XREJOPZxpHlgQM8AIDrAYSuqG7uPrkwv1ItOwEEK1EDkEwL699tLyuADxZis35bIr0huROZ4K8LsXuaVDFZeMd++H3LZVQiZXOT4zPwnJD0l5UOlPiAZelN/PzUR7gB76aV384awgbQfD4oEVpVUp0WXf4s=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
On 2/2/07, Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
It's interesting that trademarks must be defended or they are lost. So,
for example, if a church uses "Super Bowl" in violation of the trademark,
and the Super Bowl people don't really care, they still have to go after
the church for it. If they don't do it, eventually some competitor will
use it in a way that really causes problems and the Super Bowl people
won't be able to win a law suit because it will be claimed that their
trademark had lapsed into the public domain. I think that's the problem.
But they don't have to defend it with a "cease and desist" order.
They could offer a license instead. For an example of this, see:
http://www.darrenbarefoot.com/archives/2007/01/my-project-du-jour-getafirstlifecom.html#comment-75509
Regards,
Mark
EMAIL:PROTECTED
--
You think that it is a secret, but it never has been one.
- fortune cookie
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion