Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Biden is screwed

["Vern Green" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

Barak has other more significant issues to overcome before he is elected, or even gets the nomination.

 

First, he is a northerner, he will have some difficulty in the south and even more difficulty there because he is black.

 

He is also relatively new to the world of politics, this might be a good thing for him and certainly would be a great thing if he had a more recognizable name.

 

He has to raise money, what kinds of connections can he pull in to raise the kind of money required to run for president?

 

His family has to be willing to go through all of this with him, does his wife have the fortitude to be able to stand in front of cameras, be without her husband and so on? Those are questions any candidate's family has to ask, but for someone like Hilary Clinton or Joe Biden, that is second nature having been around politics so long.

 

Does he have the support from the DNC? I could see the DNC strategizing with him and telling him to ride the wave for a few more years and not running. Maybe this never happens, but I would be surprised if it doesn't.

 

I am not the only one asking these questions, and I think even Barak himself is doing to searching at this point. He has not officially announced his candidacy, he still has an out on February 10th. I think he will run, but I think he has a pretty tough uphill climb for the nomination and even more of one to make the presidency.

 

On 2/1/07, Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:

On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:

>> So will the 'swift boating' attacks backfire if they focus on this
>> episode of his life?
>
> If they happen, they have to backfire.  The point of the "swift boat"
> attacks was to portray Kerry as a liar, as someone with a sordid and
> unimpressive past that was massaged into war medals.  (I'm not here
> commenting on their validity, only their effect.)
>
> With Obama's infidelities, the guy already came out and admitted to it
> openly.  Compare what happened when Schwarzenegger simply said "I was an
> idiot" when faced with allegations of sexual harassment - it became an
> asset, not a liability.
>
> Any attack on Obama on these issues will be seen as extremely mean
> spirited, and I predict they will completely and utterly backfire.  I
> mean, even the swift boat attacks were potentially a huge liability to
> the Bush campaign, and Bush completely disavowed himself from them.

Makes sense.  We'll be watching what happens.


> (And the CBS campaign against Bush was most very definitely a liability
> to the Democrats.)

Which makes you wonder what the motivation was behind that ridiculous
scandal.  Maybe it was just a rush to be first, but it was sloppy
journalism.


> I should add - I am not endorsing Obama's candidacy - all my positive
> remarks are based only on first impressions of the guy.  But so far I
> like a lot of what I see.

Same here.  (Can you believe that?!)  I do have his new book though and I
might read some of it one of these days.  I think he is a good writer.

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion

-- 
Thanks
F Vernon Green 
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion