Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Off-Topic Discussion" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Flat Tax
- From: "Diana Hargus" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:50:39 -0600
- Delivery-date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 18:54:31 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:from:to:references:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=eE2LzPgbzlK2/GRIN4oX+dDGVCgsH+XdeUe/uVxMKuRs+Dw50m7lMqr0ECToFmlTUxaZCEXoUryGO93B2FKJawJt22cEXASB0CimL8f3KzcsxFbSXvXeHvv7y0AqdUONw1gvJKUNcgZ7qqAB6fRKNmau0d23Dx+AzpwTAW9uSlE=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Mike Millerwrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Hargus, Diana wrote:
How about this for a flat tax footnote:
Under the Constitution, Congress could impose direct taxes only if they
were levied in proportion to each State's population. Thus, when a flat
rate Federal income tax was enacted in 1894, it was quickly challenged
and in 1895 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional because it
was a direct tax not apportioned according to the population of each
state. http://www.treas.gov/education/fact-sheets/taxes/ustax.shtml
We are talking about the tax that started it all, the 16th Amenment. Need
any other reason to just say no?
Maybe I don't get it. The 16th Amendement allowed Congress to tax us.
They could use a flat income tax if they wanted.
Mike
It started as a "a flat rate Federal income tax"
Another reason I am a little leary of this whole flat tax affair is we have
people from most political parties supporting it. We have Dick Armey on
the left and we have people from the right like Daniel J. Mitchell, Ph.D.,
(http://www.heritage.org/about/staff/DanielMitchell.cfm). and then we have
the page I mentioned in a previous message with libertarians, progressives,
etc all commenting on its greatness. If so many politicians think it is so
great, why haven't they done something before now? Besides, I get a little
scared when so many politicians get together and agree on something like
this and say it is "good for us."
Then again, I could be full of it and it could all be a Republican plot to
try to make the left look bad again...
Diana
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 97149 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try SPAMfighter for free now!
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion