Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Mike Miller wrote:
It must be nice to have your opinions fed to you and be able to
dismiss a book out of hand entirely unread.
Suppose some guy, like Deepak Chopra, just came out with a new book
about quantum physics and string theory. He's no expert, but he
claims to have many experts supporting his ideas though he names none
of them. Should I read his book? No. Why not? It's a waste of
time. He's full of crap! Instead of reading his book, I'll read some
reviews of his book by PhD physicists with expertise in quantum
mechanics and string theory. If they say he is full of crap, then
I've saved some time. If they say he has written a great book on
their field, then I'll read it. It's like that with Boortz book.
Here you are discussing something that may be more empirically tested
for validation than something that can be debated until the end of time
unless it replaces our current system and is proven successful or
unsuccessful.
Now I have to decide if I should believe the Professor of Economics at
U Michigan or Christian Cepel, who seems to know nothing about
econimics. What do you think I will choose?
Whichever one matches your pet agenda, obviously.
--
Christian M. Cepel - Thistledowne Productions - http://thistledowne.org
Computer Support Specialist, Sr. - University of Missouri - Columbia
College of Education - School of Info Science & Learning Technologies
VRCbd, KidTools & StrategyTools Support Systems Projects, and Truman,
Library Whistlestop Project - Web Design & Programming - 573.999.2370
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion