MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Flat Tax
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Flat Tax
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Vern Green wrote:

This is pretty typical, throw out the whole idea because people might find a way to cheat the system.

That wasn't the point at all Vern. My point was that if you think that changing to a flat national sales tax will allow you to toss out the IRS, you should be ready to have another vast agency take its place.



When a car is bought by an individual I know for a fact that there are many times the actual purchase price is fubbed. I have done it myself.

Which is exactly why I know to expect people to try to cheat the system and why I'm sure we will have agencies studying our transactions to be sure we aren't engaging in tax fraud.



I personally support a flat tax. That is a straight flat tax across the board of whatever the percentage is. How does that hurt anyone more than anyone else?

If it's so friggin' great, Vern, then why does a professor of econ at U Michigan claim that *no* respectable economist will support the plan? Do you really think that they need a lesson from you?


Listen, I don't claim to know what is best, but I definitely get the feeling that I'm being hoodwinked by this Fair Tax idea.

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion