MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] John O'Neill
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] John O'Neill
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Jonathan King wrote:

On 12/4/06, Vern Green <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:

Its too bad he was not taken more seriously perhaps something could have been done before the attacks, what I am not sure anyone knows, but perhaps.

At any rate, I don't have time right now to look at the link provided. What is the general gist of all this? I hope it is not part of some big Bush plot to kill this guy off by having the terrorists attack the World Trade Center.

No, but I think it does highlight the fact that terrorist attacks on the US were not really in the US mind-set before 9/11. I'm not sure I'm really interested in the argument about whether or not the Bush administration was worse than the Clinton administration was or that a Gore administration might have been, but I don't think there's a big question that the level of readiness wasn't there, but that this also wasn't completely a bolt from the blue.


I watched the first four chapters. It shows how personality conflicts and power struggles within the FBI left us vulnerable to attack. It really doesn't have anything to do with Bush or Clinton as far as I can tell. The point I am getting out of it is that men struggle to be the "big man," the "head honcho," the "big cheese," and stopping terrorism is a good way to show off and make yourself a bigger bigshot, but helping someone else, even in your own agency, to stop terrorism is giving them power and giving them a chance to be the big man. First rule in the pursuit of power: You don't want to help anyone to become powerful unless they are totally behind you, promoting you and not competing with you, and all that matters is personal power, not US security.

The part I've seen so far doesn't show me any heros and villians. It's all power struggles among the macho men at the FBI. O'Neill looks good only because he is on top of the facts, but he is not so good at making things happen within the FBI because he wants to be the big man and that offends many of his colleagues and superiors (because they also want to be the big man).

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion