Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Off-Topic Discussion" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Employee Privacy, Employer Policy
- From: "Jerry Gamblin" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 07:44:25 -0600
- Delivery-date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 07:44:44 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=MNUNNnS9Zp9hejHgBcuMvyexoP5DlF5dN8nXW/yhr/zQEvvAUVCXexUh+Zm8OMyvOY9vWnVZYdUhW5JxMWo6GC/NzdjY3yF6g8US8cQXwJJFlUw0UIYom4jWidduHXYTaK0kSmThXao/HMa1Eu2DIzJtUoMh+sOuk/ycu804vJs=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
This article looks at two recent court cases where a government
employee's reasonable expectation of privacy was more important than
the employer's ability to read any employee's e-mail - despite a
privacy policy that clearly stated any company e-mail can, and will,
be monitored.
http://www.securityfocus.com/print/columnists/421
So what does this do to most acceptable use policies? Does it make
them useless if even a military AUP won't stand up in a military
court?
--
Thanks,
Jerry Gamblin
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact