Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Is everybody asleep?

[Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:

> The point of this whole thread was whether people pick on one time 
> comments unfairly.  It started with the current picking on Kerry, and I 
> agreed with you that this was wrong.  But then someone else picked on 
> the Republicans because that person interpreted their statements as 
> saying Democrats are traitors.  I pointed out that this is just as bad 
> as picking on Kerry.
>
> Now, if you want to change the subject to "are the Democrats really into 
> appeasement," that is fine.  I'm not feeling up to that discussion right 
> now, but maybe someone else wants to get into it.

I thought you changed the subject when you said "I happen to agree with 
Rove."


> In the meantime, let's stay on subject.  Do you feel that those 
> statements of Rove were meant to imply that Democrats are traitors?

I think they were meant to imply that Democrats will not fight a terrorist 
enemy, and that they believe terrorists just need to be treated better and 
they will top killing people, or that they will try to establish a 
dialogue with someone like Osama bin Laden.  Rove wants us to think that 
Democrat politicians are very naive.  I don't think they are at all.

See my next message "Bush Administration very weak on terror" for some 
factual details.

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion