MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Dump House Leader for Protecting Foley
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Dump House Leader for Protecting Foley
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
I have a little personal connection to this actually. Rep. Shimkus is the chair of the House Page Board/Committee/whatever. I worked for his campaign in 1994 literally hundreds of hours, he used to be a teacher at my Lutheran high school, and I worked for his campaigns as Madison County Treasurer. I've known him and his family for my entire life. His wife played organ at a church I taught Sunday school, at my grandparents funerals, his parents go there, etc. He's one of 4 US Congressmen with military service. He holds my respect and admiration.

I don't believe the emails were illegal or predatory. Strange and inappropriate sure - and I think he (Foley) should have resigned as he did. I also think Rep Shimkus and other GOP leaders did the appropriate thing in late 2005 by saying "Hey whacko, this isn't cool - knock it off." Would anyone else in the same situation have done differently? Keep in mind the IM messages just surfaced I believe; I think the email asking for a pic was the only evidence at the time.

Unless I'm missing something this seems like a bigass political play and nothing more (which is expected). I'm not blaming the dems or anything, just pointing out that the claims of inaction and predatory/ illegal emails are blown out of proportion IMHO.

-- Brent

On Oct 3, 2006, at 1:23 PM, Mike Miller wrote:

On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Phillip Kelchen wrote:

On Tuesday 03 October 2006 11:50, Mike Miller wrote:

I snipped out the URLs and email addresses from this message. I guess it's no surprise they're going after Hastert. --Mike

Of course it's no surprise as that behavior is taken straight out of the National Politics for Dummies textbook- find anybody with ANY link at all (the more powerful the person the better!) no matter how tenuous, to the problem and hammer them publicly about it and call for a resignation. If you can get away with it, then you succeeded in causing damage to your opposition. If you didn't get them ousted, then you have political fodder for next election- "He was sooooo sleazy that he refused to resign even after $EVENT..." It's a no-risk way to make the other side look a lot worse than they really are and to score yourself anywhere from little to a huge amount of credit and votes.


That's all true, but there are some interesting wrinkles on the current drama:

The Washington Times -- a very "conservative" (some would say insanely right-wing) newspaper is asking Hastert to step down:

http://washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20061002-102008-9058r.htm

House Majority Leader John Boehner, Republican, is blaming Hastert for problems:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2006/10/boehner_points_.html

So it isn't just Democrats attacking Hastert because he's vulnerable right now. Everyone is attacking him, partly in self- defense ("It isn't 'Republicans' who screwed up, it's just Hastert!")

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion


_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion