MLUG: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] what waterboarding looks like [Politics]
RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] what waterboarding looks like [Politics]
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Hargus, Diana wrote:

`(b) Authority for Military Commissions Under This Chapter- The President is authorized to establish military commissions under this chapter for offenses triable by military commission as provided in this chapter. (from HR 6166 at http://thomas.loc.gov ; the links are dynamic and don't stay pointed to where they are supposed to point)

So there'd be no oversight -- it's the President fully in control of the whole thing. Extreme case: Bush says that John Kerry is an enemy combatant, Bush has Kerry imprisoned, Kerry is brought before a "Military Commission" hand picked by Bush, Kerry is not allowed to hear the evidence against him, the Commission finds Kerry guilty, and Kerry has no further recourse. So what in the *law* would prevent Bush from doing this? We don't want to pass a series of laws that basically say "a military coup is now legal in the US at the discretion of the President."


Of course, no President would pick out a single Senator and do as I just stated. He would do it to all of the senators at once (the ones who weren't in on it anyway). Same for the Supreme Court. If this sounds crazy and far-fetched to you, fine, but think about other nations -- it's common there. You just have to brainwash the military and you're all set. Once you've eliminated most of the opposition in the House, Senate and Supreme Court and declared martial law, you rewrite the constitution, control the media, and you're golden.


While searching for the full text of the bill, I came across this gem they were trying to get through:

Universal National Service Act of 2006 (Introduced in House)

If everyone was required to serve in the military, how many wars do you think we'd have? I'm sure that's what Rangel is up to, or he's trying to make a point -- the rich make the poor serve for them, the rich don't serve.


Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion