MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] what waterboarding looks like [Politics]
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] what waterboarding looks like [Politics]
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Jonathan King wrote:
There is evidently some question about whether waterboarding is or is
not banned by recent legislation addressing how we can interrogate and
try certain enemy combatants (and what an enemy combatant really is,
and that's very worrisome, because there are no hard standards).

Let me address just this issue of what constitutes an enemy combatant. I am not an expert on the Geneva convention by any means. Being a US citizen incurs certain rights (due process, etc), and also being a POW incurs certain rights (Geneva convention, etc). But these also incur certain responsibilities. For example, with POW's, the combatants should be wearing uniforms. Presumably they should be fighting according to the rules of war (e.g. white flag is never used as a pretext for a surprise attack).


But here we are fighting a people who care nothing for the rules of war, and indeed who are willing to use our inherent decency against us. Thus when one group use a white flag as a means to get a surprise attack on us, we still feel compelled to treat the next white flag as genuine. And perhaps with good reason, because sometimes the next group of people using the white flag really mean it. But I do think that the US has the right to no longer regard the white flag.

Nevertheless, the US still comes under scrutiny. So for example, they have check points which the bad guys frequently try to blow up using suicide bombers. This leads the US to use tactics which can invariably lead to innocent people being shot at check points, because the civilians inadvertently fail to follow the proper procedures (or in some cases they are forced to drive through at speed by the bad guys). But the media always lay the blame on the US soldiers, and not on those who have created this environment in which it is much harder to adhere to decent rules of warfare.

In WWII, enemy combatants who did not meet the requirements of POW were shot. This happened even after the war was over, during the occupation of Germany, and the subsequent de-Nazification.

Stephen

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion