MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] the Pope's remarks
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] the Pope's remarks
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The Pope apologized today. Some scholars are saying that it is the first time in the history of the papacy that a pope has issued a public apology. This article is interesting (requires free registration):

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/17/world/europe/17cnd-pope.html

I'm sure there are many more articles out there to be found. The text of his apology is below.

It seems to me that he is trying to put it all on the quote from the medieval Persian guy. There was more to it than that. He led up to it with this gem:

   In the seventh conversation [text unclear] edited by Professor Khoury,
   the emperor touches on the theme of the holy war. The emperor must have
   known that surah 2, 256 reads: "There is no compulsion in religion".

   According to the experts, this is one of the suras of the early period,
   when Mohammed was still powerless and under threat. But naturally the
   emperor also knew the instructions, developed later and recorded in the
   Qur'an, concerning holy war.

Which means to me that the Pope was saying that Mohammed was disingenuous (because he was powerless and under threat) when he claimed "There is no compulsion in religion" and that the truly violent nature of Mohammed's religion was expressed later in the Qur'an. The Pope disagrees strongly with Mohammed's ideas about holy war, and he rejects the view of God that is held by many Muslims. I think he was pretty clear on those issues and he hasn't retracted any of it. I'm not saying that he should retract it, but let's not pretend that problems we're going to have with violent reactions to the Pope's speech are all due to misunderstandings from uneducated Muslims. That isn't it. The problem is that there are millions of Muslims who believe that anyone who publicly expresses reservations about their religion has "defamed" them and should be killed for it.

It would be comical if it weren't so horrible -- someone says "Islam is too violent" and thousands of Muslims errupt in violent protest. It's almost like they want to say "your darned right we're violent!"

Meanwhile, angry Muslims are attacking various churches and have killed a nun in Mogadishu, Somalia (probably related to the Pope's speech but not certainly).

Mike


Dear Brothers and Sisters,

The pastoral visit which I recently made to Bavaria was a deep spiritual experience, bringing together personal memories linked to places well known to me and pastoral initiatives towards an effective proclamation of the Gospel for today.

I thank God for the interior joy which he made possible, and I am also grateful to all those who worked hard for the success of this pastoral visit. As is the custom, I will speak more of this during next Wednesday's general audience.

At this time, I wish also to add that I am deeply sorry for the reactions in some countries to a few passages of my address at the University of Regensburg, which were considered offensive to the sensibility of Muslims.

These in fact were a quotation from a Medieval text, which do not in any way express my personal thought.

Yesterday, the Cardinal Secretary of State published a statement in this regard in which he explained the true meaning of my words. I hope that this serves to appease hearts and to clarify the true meaning of my address, which in its totality was and is an invitation to frank and sincere dialogue, with great mutual respect.

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion