Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] the Pope's remarks and Muslim response
- From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 14:48:44 -0500
- Delivery-date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 14:49:26 -0500
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060914
Mike Miller wrote:
You picked a good time to bring this up. What did you think about what
the Pope said the other day? Text of his speech:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/pope/story/0,,1873277,00.html
I tried to read the Pope's words. It looks like it is an interesting
theological commentary, with the part below only meant to illuminate
some wider point. I confess that I did not understand a lot of the
Pope's speech. I think that for him an attack on Islam was not what he
was intending. (For example, in a later part of his speech he seems to
be criticising the Reformation - its a good thing those Lutherans and
Calvinists aren't burning effegies of the Pope.) As best as I can see,
perhaps he is arguing that Christianity is the joining of Jewish and
Greek (Hellenistic) thought. Heck, it even might be construed as a
pro-Orthodox speech (Catholics and Orthodox have been at odds with each
other since the turn of the last millenium). Thus my guess is that he
is quoting Manuel II, not for the purpose of critcising Islam per se,
but rather for the broader implications of his statements.
Text of the Vatican response to Muslim anger at the speech:
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/world/4191825.html
Some reports inaccurately state that the Pope spent 3 paragraphs on
Islam -- it was actually much more than that. He suggests that
Christian and Muslim differ fundamentally in their view of the nature of
God (with the superior Christian view derived from the Greek notion that
God is rational). He also suggests that "holy war" is wrong and that
"spreading the faith by the sword" is wrong. The thing that pissed
people off the most was this quotation from Byzantine emperor Manuel II
Paleologus:
[Byzantine emperor Manuel II Paleologus] addresses his interlocutor
with a startling brusqueness on the central question about the
relationship between religion and violence in general, saying: "Show me
just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things
only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the
faith he preached".
For some reason, many Muslims are protesting the speech through
threatening, violent or destructive acts. How do they expect the
non-Islamic world to react to that?
The Muslim Brotherhood is not happy. This is the group that Sayyid Qutb
promoted -- Qutb also inspired the founders of al Qaeda.
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion