Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Spurling, Shannon wrote:
<sarcasm>Well, I don't know about any one else, but I sure don't see any
bias in the topic of the first timeline.</sarcasm>
There isn't bias in a topic, just bias in reporting about a topic. There
is nothing wrong with writing a history of deception by some group of
people. In fact, I would love to see all the ways that Bill Clinton
supposedly lied to us or deceived us about any topic including his sex
life.
To focus on the what with out looking at the why can be very misleading.
That is why information left out of the first one is biased. I found the
second one very informative about the complete history of the topic.
When considering that we, and our Congress, were lied to, we are also
supposed to consider why we were lied to?
Whatever.
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact