RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] War timeline

["Spurling, Shannon" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

<sarcasm>Well, I don't know about any one else, but I sure don't see any
bias in the topic of the first timeline.</sarcasm>

To focus on the what with out looking at the why can be very misleading.
That is why information left out of the first one is biased. I found the
second one very informative about the complete history of the topic.

S

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: EMAIL:PROTECTED [mailto:discussion-
> EMAIL:PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Miller
> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 3:36 PM
> To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion
> Subject: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] War timeline
> 
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Spurling, Shannon wrote:
> 
> > What was the topic? Please state the topic each timeline alluded to,
> > just for clarity.
> 
> The topic of the original timeline was a history of deception by the
Bush
> administration.  It wasn't a history of Iraq, or Saddam or Clinton or
the
> Middle East.
> 
> Vern's was a history of events leading up to the Iraq War focusing on
> Saddam.
> 
> Mike
> 
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
> http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion


_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion