MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] last days
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] last days
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Mike Miller wrote:
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Vern Green wrote:

Some of the stories they use on Newshour to set-up the guests seem to be slanted at times. I do thing the show is more unbiased than most though.


That's how it "seems" to you. So what? Why should anyone care? To be even clearer on this issue: If a story seems biased to me, I don't care. What I do care about is evidence and clear, demonstrable patterns. I also care about what other news reporters say (this is one kind of evidence), especially if they can back it up with some facts.

I think you are being unfair on this issue. Even if the facts presented are completely correct, the story can still show a great deal of bias. For example, I consider the European media's showing of dead Lebanese due to Israeli bombs all day long on the news T.V. to be biased reporting, even though the facts of the matter are completely correct. Bias should also be considered by how the matter is presented contextually. Furthermore the tone (e.g. "experts" as opposed to "supposed experts") plays a very significant role.


In fact, if one believes of oneself that things like the "tone" play no role in how you perceive a story, you will in fact be particularly susceptible to this kind of bias.


--

Stephen Montgomery-Smith
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion