Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Mike Miller wrote:
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Mike Miller wrote:
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=2319986
Scientists they interviewed said that it is now established that
global warming is happening and that it is caused by human activity.
They also said that the dozen-or-so scientists who persist in making
claims to the contrary are no more credible than Holocaust deniers
and some of them are being paid to lie by the energy industry.
While I'm not wishing to dispute the content of these statements,
nevertheless I'm afraid that the argument "scientists appearing on ABC
said so" doesn't help convince me.
Fine. Does "scientists said so" have no effect on you, or is the
involvement of ABC what concerns you. Why in the world would ABC want
to bias their report? I have no clue.
Am I so predicatable that you can predict which of these two has no
effect on me?
Find one reputable scientist who says that human activity is having no
effect on global temperature.
What part of "not wishing to dispute the content of these statements"
don't you understand?
The thing is, you are religious and you believe that Bush will promote
your religion. You desperately want to promote your religion, so you
tend to be very slow to recognize the validity of anything that works
against Bush's ideas. One of Bush's ideas, which seems to get no
support even from the scientists he has picked for himself, is that the
case for an effect of human activity on global warming has not been made
convincingly. You are very predictable in that way.
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion