Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Perpetual Motion Machine?
- From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:43:49 -0500
- Delivery-date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:44:01 -0500
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Organization: University of Missouri
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060823
Mike Miller wrote:
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Michael wrote:
If you doubt the possibility of a free energy engine, ie a perpetual
motion machine, I'd suggest studying Tesla.
It looks like "free energy" means that you don't have to pay for it.
That is entirely different from a perpetual motion machine. In
perpetual motion there can be no external source of energy, not even a
free one. Thus, the Earth's rotation, Earth's magnetic field, power from
the Sun or movement of air are all not allowed in perpetual motion.
Is there any energy source we humans use that doesn't come from the sun,
at least indirectly?
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion