Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Banner Add rotation.
- From: "Christian M. Cepel" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 03:54:06 -0500
- Delivery-date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 02:55:45 -0500
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
I've noticed a bizarre situation with banner adds. Like you I never
really pay attention to them anyways, but twice in as many days, I have
been on a site and seen one out of the corner of my eye just after I
clicked a button to go to another part of the site. When I click back,
I find out that it's a rotating system as it loads a new add into the
space. Now here's the thing. One would assume that these are random,
or perhaps a bit weighted to those who pay more, but eventually you
should be able to come up with the add you're looking for assuming a
finite selection of adds. Yes I realize that even with a pseudo random,
that this could take a long time, but still it would not account for the
behavior I've seen on Snopes.com and Dictionary.com such that if I hit
reload a couple of times, eventually I'll land on a Shutterfly and
Classmates.com advertisement respectively and then no matter how many
times I continue to reload, I'll never get a different add.
Do these things have some sort of cookie component? I wonder if their
algorithms are just so screwed up that after X iterrations it fails to
deliver new content.
Thoughts?
I never have gotten back to the adds I was looking for. I never thought
I'd say that and actually care.
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion