Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [RELIGION] Defining a Christian act... was Disowning Conservative Politics, Evangelical Pastor Rattles Flock
- From: Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:40:57 -0500 (CDT)
- Delivery-date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 08:42:19 -0500
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Christian M. Cepel wrote:
By this, the opposition loves to point out that Christians are:
a) intolerant
b) judgmental
c) condemning
The real answer to this is, "Well Duh!"
When one believes in an absolute, and especially when that belief is in
a God who has stated absolutely that he's absolute, there's not really
any wiggle room there.
But the crazy part is that there really is no good reason to believe what
you believe. We know this because there are many other religions with
billions of people following them and they don't believe the same as you
do. So you decided to be "absolute," but you don't have to be. Your
absolutism doesn't follow from your belief in God, it is your choice
because you are choosing to believe in an absolutistic God.
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion